On 18/02/11 00:37, rsmogura wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:06:22 +1300, Oliver Jowett wrote: >> On 17/02/11 23:18, rsmogura wrote: >>> Yes, but driver checks number of declared out parameters and number of >>> resulted parameters (even check types of those), to prevent programming >>> errors. >> >> And..? >> >> Oliver > > And it will throw exception when result will income. If you will remove > this then you will lose check against programming errors, when number of > expected parameters is different that number of actual parameters. Bear > in mind that you will get result set of 6 columns, but only 1 is > expected. I think you can't determine what should be returned and how to > fix result without signature.
You've completely missed the point. I am not suggesting we change those checks at all. I am suggesting we change how the JDBC driver translates call escapes to queries so that for N OUT parameters, we always get exactly N result columns, without depending on the datatypes of the parameters in any way. Oliver -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
