On 6/12/13 10:55 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > But it's got to be pretty common to archive to a local > path that happens to be a remote mount, or to a local directory whose > contents are subsequently copied off by a batch job. Making that work > nicely with near-zero configuration would be a significant advance.
Doesn't that just move the problem to managing NFS or batch jobs? Do we want to encourage that? I suspect that there are actually only about 5 or 6 common ways to do archiving (say, local, NFS, scp, rsync, S3, ...). There's no reason why we can't fully specify and/or script what to do in each of these cases. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
