On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Heikki Linnakangas < hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > > >Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to create it correctly in the first place? > > > > Looking at the code, I think it is very well possible to create > > it correctly in the first place without much extra work. I will > > send a patch if nobody sees any problem with this change. > > Attached patch implements the above suggested fix. > I have removed the earlier code which was used to update the > symlink path.
Today morning, I realised that there is one problem with the patch I sent yesterday and the problem is that incase user has not given -T option, it will not be able to create the symlink for appropriate path. Attached patch fix this issue. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
pg_basebackup_relocate_tablespace_v4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
