On 22/03/15 08:34, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 03/21/2015 12:00 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
-1
Personally I'm against hiding *any* settings. Choosing sensible defaults
- yes! Hiding them - that reeks of secret squirrel nonsense and overpaid
Oracle dbas that knew the undocumented settings for various
capabilities. I think/hope that no open source project will try to
emulate that meme!
I don't agree with this at all. On the one hand:
Postgres: So many settings people have no idea where to start (unless
they have background)
vs
Postgres: Only the settings that are "needed" for 95% of installations.
JD
How about 2 config files?
One marked adult^H^H^H^H^H power users only, or some such, with the
really dangerous or unusual options?
Cheers,
Gavin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
