On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:02:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Still, it seems clear that the bulk of the shutdown time is indeed the > stats collector taking its time about shutting down, which is doubly > weird because the ecpg tests shouldn't have created very many tables, > so why would there be a lot of data to write? Even granting that it's > not writing to ramdisk, 57 seconds to shut down seems pretty excessive. > > I wonder if it's worth sticking some instrumentation into stats > collector shutdown?
I wouldn't be surprised if the collector got backlogged during the main phase of testing and took awhile to chew through its message queue before even starting the write of the final stats. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
