On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > On 30 November 2016 at 16:19, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cab7npqthydyf-fo+fzvxrhz-7_hptm4rodbcsy9-noqhvet...@mail.gmail.com >> >> I'll be interested to know if it breaks anyone's MUA. If it doesn't all we >> will be arguing about are aesthetics, and I'm a firm believer in function >> over form. > > I can't say I feel especially strongly either way on this but just to > toss out a small thing that might make a small difference.... > > If you happen to know how your message-ids are generated then you > might be able to do something useful with them. For instance, you > could search all git commits for urls to messages you wrote -- for > instance any commit that has CAB7nPq is referencing a message written > by Michael Paquier. > > On the other hand you could put something naughty in the message-id > forcing everyone else to use URLs with dirty words in them. Or with > words like "terrorist" in them. Or with some javascript/html injection > attack of some sort...
...or the name of your company/your email hosting provider's company... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
