On 2016-12-01 18:12:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> When and if somebody tries to game that, we can do something about it, > >> but I'm not very worried. It's not like it's not trivial to get your > >> company's name, or $badword of your choice, into the archives already. > > > Sure, of course. But it's a bit different when it's in the commit log. > > Sure, but there's a filter in that case: if a committer finds a messageID > sufficiently offensive, he can just not quote it in the commit message. > There's precedent for that; I've more than once omitted crediting > somebody's bug report when it was submitted under an obviously fake name. > > I'm not finding myself fussed about this.
+1. I mean if people behave intentionally offensive, we can always tell them and starting ignoring them. Seems like they'd stop doing that soon, because their patches won't get in/their bugs won't get fixed. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
