On 2016-12-01 18:05:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > ... the shortener isn't really doing anything for us. You end up with a > line longer than 80 characters with message-IDs generated by either gmail > or the bug report form, for instance these examples from recent commits:
Still seems quite useful to me. I don't really see much argument against. This: > Discussion: > https://postgr.es/m/20161128182113.6527.58...@wrigleys.postgresql.org > Discussion: > https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUEE29=X01JXdz8_TQvo6n9=2xoebbrnq8rklyr+kj...@mail.gmail.com still looks better than: > Discussion: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161128182113.6527.58...@wrigleys.postgresql.org > Discussion: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+renyUEE29=X01JXdz8_TQvo6n9=2xoebbrnq8rklyr+kj...@mail.gmail.com and I see little downside. If we can't keep the first stable, we can't keep the second one stable either. > Another convention that apparently needs to be discussed is whether or > not to point at a whole thread, as in this example from yesterday: > > Discussion: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5EE995@G01JPEXMBYT05/ > > I'm kind of -1 on that; it's adding 5 characters for not much. -1 on that too. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
