--On Friday, August 29, 2003 22:58:50 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Larry Rosenman wrote:


--On Thursday, August 28, 2003 19:31:17 +0200 Peter Eisentraut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Tom Lane writes:
>
>> Beta2 is a done deal.  When Bruce gets back from the seashore I expect
>> he'll take a look at the issues you raised, but we're not holding off
>> beta2 another week for that to happen.
>
> Could someone tell the rest of the world ahead of time when release
> steps are going to happen?

AND make sure key people are *NOT UNAVAILABLE* for issues?

Larry, you keep going in this direction and I will think about pulling thread support for Unixware, and the rest of the group might cheer! (SCO == Unixware) In fact, my just saying someone else has to handle the Unixware threading issues might kill it right there.

For the record, per platform threading will probably be in flux even
after the final release as we adjust thing for various threading
libraries/flags.

OK, back to the 1k emails that arrived in the last two days.


Don't start on the SCO issue.  I submitted patches last weekend to fix the
UnixWare (and possibly other) issues.

You said you were working on them, then I see the note that BETA2 was tagged
with INVALID shell code in src/templates/unixware, and
the per-platform threading stuff BROKEN on UnixWare.

When I left for Las Vegas on 8/16, it was **WORKING**. You committed a change
that BROKE it again.


Yes, I'm pissed.

UnixWare==SCO, but the Court fight has **NOTHING** to do with this issue.

Does the PG core not care anymore about **QUALITY**?

I'm NOT going to stand idly by as the SCO/IBM/RED HAT Legal issues are used to
hurt PostgreSQL's quality.


I'm NOT very pleased.



--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to