Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Okay, I don't want to force an initdb just for this either. But if we > >> do one for other reasons, it's toast. > > > I don't see why an initdb is required: if we want to remove it, we can > > replace the function's implementation with elog(ERROR, "this function > > has been removed"), or the like. The difference between doing that much > > and actually removing the function's catalog entry is pretty negligible > > from the user's POV. > > No, not at all. A nonfunctional catalog entry gets in the way of the > user replacing the function, should he wish to do that.
Yea, but I would call the odds of that "pretty negligible". -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
