On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 11:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: <snip> > > No, not at all. A nonfunctional catalog entry gets in the way of the > > user replacing the function, should he wish to do that. > > Yea, but I would call the odds of that "pretty negligible".
What if they're trying to restore backwards compatibility by adding the function? Regards, Jeff ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]