On 5/18/05, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The key requirement that has always come up is that the core developers > wouldn't use anything web based, so the tracker would have to somehow tie > into the mailing lists themselves ... >
What's the basis of this objection to a web-based dev management system? Seems like web-based makes plenty of sense for a physically disparate development community like this one. It also seems that, once you get it up and running, any worthwhile dev management system is going to actually take less time / effort to maintain than, say, maintaining manually concocted todo lists and coordinating development via a mailing list. Call me a normaliser, but even if the maintenance cost is higher, I think it's worth it to have a centralised, authoratitive, organised repository for dev task data. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
