Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 5/16/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Set a fixed date (ie. 3 weeks) and whatever isn't in gets punted to 8.4 ... > > if > > that means those 'large patches' don't get applied, so be it ... > > I disagree with that approach. Larger more complex patches required > much more work and effort than small, simple ones. Not only do I > think it's unfair to the authors who spent considerably more time on > their work, but I think it also sets a bad precedent for future work; > saying, in short, that if you want to make large strides to improve > PostgreSQL, and you followed the community development process, you're > still potentially last in line for review.
Yep. We lose a lot of credibility if we did that. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
