btw, a couple things that I know still doesn't work in Nautilus with trees:

- drag and drop (I failed miserably when trying to implement it, any help here 
would be welcome :) 
- multiselection  in packages

Esteban


On Oct 17, 2013, at 12:20 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I just important an important change in Pharo. 
> I made a new step over the integration of RPackage into the system, and as a 
> result there is a different behavior. 
> Although 99% of users shouldn't notice it, that can drive to headaches to 
> tool developers, like Thierry and his AltBrowser (but I'm not sure about 
> that) :)  
> I'm sorry, but this is inevitable... and part of a long path discussed and 
> adopted since almost 1 1/2 years. 
> 
> So, what's the change? 
> Now 1 RPackage 0 1 MCPackage. 
> As a result, package granularity is coarse, and then categories for class are 
> stored as package tags.
> Other consequence is that RPackageSet is now more or less useless, but I'm 
> keeping it because it provides caching services  for monticello, and the 
> speed up resulting is good :)
> This change opens the path to remove old PackageInfo, finally :)
> 
> To take the new structure into account (and to add a long time awaited 
> feature), I modified nautilus to use a tree instead a simple list (finally!)
> And since I was in the mood, I moved groups to same list, taking the idea of 
> the screenshot Stef sent the other day (lots of good ideas that we should 
> adopt there), and then I removed the "groups" button... in functionality is 
> good, but visually not so much... I accept ideas about :)
> 
> THERE WILL BE BUGS!
> This is a really deep and important change, I'm pushing it because we need to 
> test and fix. So, do not hesitate to send your reports!
> Also, there are features in modified-nautilus that are missing. It would be 
> good to have a list of them so I can implement it :)
> 
> Please, report any issue around. 
> 
> Enjoy, 
> Esteban
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to