This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements. http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html
Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That may be too much. I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts that are changing in all corners. Phil --- Philippe Back Dramatic Performance Improvements Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 Mail:p...@highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos High Octane SPRL rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/ Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast - http://spamcast.libsyn.com Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added Reseller On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr > wrote: > Hi guys > > It would be good not to clean without a clear vision. > For example we cannot register an old browser to browse code via the menu > of a window. > Now let us think two minutes to see if you can get my point: > > - I want to unload nautilus, rb, keymapping, athens, Ecompletion, > Gofer, NativeBoost, Zinc, ….. > and reload them via their configuration so that we can manage > Pharo with configurations. > > - Right now we LOST yes LOST the configurations of most of the > part of the systems (I just spendt several afternoon > on the one of RB in the past and now guess what) because > we do not have a process to use them and we are afraid to have 10 > packages and 10 classes more in the system. > I do not understand why we do not start to put the configuration > inside the image. To me this is totally stupid > not to do it. > > - Now without a browser this is nearly impossible to work. So we > will remove the old browser > but we should go slowly because else I will you do it with emacs > outside the image to see if you succeed. > > So it would be good to focus on real impacting changes. > > Stef >
