Exactly. This researcher/industry - lab/delivery is always present, no matter where one goes.
I was thinking more along the lines of: Investing in the industry Thousands of vendors depend on Intel® processors for product development. To help them forge ahead with new product advancements, Intel invests heavily in research that drives innovations at the silicon level and establishes new, industry-wide standards. *Combined with the predictability *of Intel’s tick-tock model, these efforts promote faster, more efficient innovation throughout the industry—year-in and year-out. --- Philippe Back Dramatic Performance Improvements Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 Mail:p...@highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos High Octane SPRL rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/ Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast - http://spamcast.libsyn.com Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added Reseller On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > > > Am 24.11.2013 um 21:18 schrieb Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>: > > > On 24 Nov 2013, at 21:08, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > > This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements. > > > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html > > Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. > That may be too much. > > I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts > that are changing in all corners. > > > Maybe we should give up, define Pharo as finished and be happy. > > > I don't think that every statement that has a notion like the one from > phil needs a response out of self-defense. This will happen as long as the > "researcher guys" and the "industry guys" share the same table. It is just > the way it is and we are free to leave statements uncommented. > > Norbert >
