Yes. Reading what Juan Vuletich is working on for the next Morphic there is a lot said about things I imagine would negatively impact performance if a lot of deliberate effort isn't made to offset them.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com> wrote: > I couldn't tell exactly, I haven't used Cuis in the last year or so, > but at that time (Pharo 2 was new) it was the faster of the three > brothers (Pharo/Squeak/Cuis). > > Maybe that changed lately and Cuis got slower too. Apparently it is > very easy to bloat Morphic. > > Regards, > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > > 2014-06-01 21:07 GMT-03:00 darrinm <dar...@massena.com>: > >> You get a Cuis image and it's super fast. > > > > What machine are you running on? I just gave the 2009 image of Cuis a > try on > > my current-model Mac Pro (3.6 GHz, 6 cores, tons of RAM) and honestly > just > > dragging a window around was terribly slow. Just guessing, I'd say 10 > FPS or > > less which probably half what I see with Pharo. > > > > Is the VM a factor? Should I try a different one? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/GPU-accelerated-GUI-tp4760898p4761231.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > >
