On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view > to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in the > System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ? Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I probably wouldn’t add it. In the latter case it’s open for discussion. Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into System-Hashing. Cheers, Max
