I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look... On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view >> to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in the >> System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ? > > Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 base > implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I probably > wouldn’t add it. In the latter case it’s open for discussion. Personally, I > think it belongs into a separate package, not into System-Hashing. > > Cheers, > Max
