thank you, Sven. Did you try this in 3.0, too. I would need it there! Norbert
> Am 25.06.2014 um 00:11 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395/Add-SHA256-HashFunction > > cleaned up, documented, properly packaged. > > Passes some test vectors. > > I changed the handling of the empty stream. > >> On 24 Jun 2014, at 23:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >> >> Hi Jan, >> >> I loaded just the class CFSHA256 and it worked perfectly (I didn't expect >> anything else). >> >> I tried some examples from Wikipedia >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha256#Examples_of_SHA-2_variants): >> >> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog') hex. >> 'd7a8fbb307d7809469ca9abcb0082e4f8d5651e46d3cdb762d02d0bf37c9e592' >> >> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.') hex. >> 'ef537f25c895bfa782526529a9b63d97aa631564d5d789c2b765448c8635fb6c' >> >> So I will rename the class to SHA256, moving it to System-Hashing and add >> SHA256Tests for starters. >> >> Sven >> >>> On 20 Jun 2014, at 17:01, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class was mostly >>> copied from the Cryptography [1] project. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jan. >>> >>> [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/ >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, François Stephany >>> <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Max, >>> >>> Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm >>> no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation". >>> Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;) >>> >>> Sven, >>> >>> The bare minimum to load it is: >>> >>> Gofer it >>> smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork'; >>> package: 'Cloudfork-Common'; >>> package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform'; >>> load. >>> >>> The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >>> I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look... >>> >>>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of >>>>> view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) >>>>> in the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ? >>>> >>>> Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 >>>> base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I >>>> probably wouldn’t add it. In the latter case it’s open for discussion. >>>> Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into >>>> System-Hashing. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Max > >
