Hello, I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class was mostly copied from the Cryptography [1] project.
Cheers, Jan. [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/ On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, François Stephany < tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote: > Max, > > Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm > no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation". > Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;) > > Sven, > > The bare minimum to load it is: > > Gofer it > smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork'; > package: 'Cloudfork-Common'; > package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform'; > load. > > The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform. > > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> > wrote: > >> I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look... >> >> On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of >> view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in >> the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ? >> > >> > Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 >> base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I >> probably wouldn’t add it. In the latter case it’s open for discussion. >> Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into >> System-Hashing. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Max >> >> >> >
