2015-03-24 15:16 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > > On 24 Mar 2015, at 14:29, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is a big diffirence between Morphic and the other. Morphic is a full > solution and mature one as well. The others , with the exception of Bloc , > try to wrap things up or offering better solution to some areas. > > > The one thing I don't understand is why improving Morphic or even > redesigning it is not even on the table. Looks to me like the least painful > scenario. Unless thats the intention of Bloc to be the next generation of > Morphic. In that case I am all for Bloc. > > > if you read my mail, you will notice that I said BOTH are on the table > (and we are actually moving oon both): > - Bloc is the redesign > - In the mean time we WORK and ENCOURAGE others to work on improve it. > > but Morphic it self has several fundamental flaws that cannot be fixed and > that's why in the long, very long way, needs to be replaced. >
One of the problem is that the Morphic replacement will probably be less than Morphic was (or was intended to be) :( You'll probably tell me that for the kind of work we're doing in UI with Pharo, we don't need the power of Morphic and I'd agree with you. Still, I will miss the demise of Morphic. Thierry
