--- Begin Message ---
> Le 24 mars 2015 à 15:56, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
>
> 2015-03-24 15:39 GMT+01:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com
> <mailto:dionisi...@gmail.com>>:
>
> 2015-03-24 17:36 GMT+03:00 Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com
> <mailto:thierry.goub...@gmail.com>>:
> IMHO, Rubrics, just from it's layout approach, is already a step backward.
>
>
> What you mean by this? What's wrong with Rubric layouting?
>
> Padding -> resolved in Morphic by Morph composition: no need to add that to
> the Layout engine of each widget
>
> Aligning -> resolved in Morphic by Morph composition: no need to add that to
> the Layout engine of each widget
>
I don’t get it sorry.
maybe one example would help
> ZOrdering -> nothing says that submorphs in Morphic can't overlay each other.
Bloc uses z-ordering exactly as Morphic (the code for adding/removing a
submorph are nearly the same)
Cheers
Alain
>
> One of the issue with Morphic as it stands today is that the API is fairly
> complex if you want to carefully control placement and morph behavior under
> container resizing / move. Oh, and it's very buggy too. Rubricks shows an API
> which is even more complex, which isn't surprising if the inspiration is CSS
> layout.
>
> Thierry
--- End Message ---
