2015-03-24 15:27 GMT+01:00 Alain Plantec via Pharo-dev < pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>:
> > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Alain Plantec <alain.plan...@yahoo.com> > To: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > Cc: > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:27:18 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Which one to use? [WAS: Re: GLMBrick whats next?] > Hello Thierry, > > > Le 24 mars 2015 à 15:24, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > One of the problem is that the Morphic replacement will probably be less > than Morphic was (or was intended to be) :( > > why do you think so ? > Because we're doing a rewrite, with no uses of the specifics of what Morphic uses. So whatever usage of a pattern of code, or of layout or display that was special to Morphic, will disappear: nobody will keep dead code which only exercise a corner case of Morphic alone. IMHO, Rubrics, just from it's layout approach, is already a step backward. Who knows why a Morph does z-ordering of its submorphs in the reverse order of all other gui toolkits? Has Bloc kept that? Why should it keep it? It's messing up Spec gui building. It will be disappear. Thierry > Cheers > Alain > > > > > You'll probably tell me that for the kind of work we're doing in UI with > Pharo, we don't need the power of Morphic and I'd agree with you. > > > > Still, I will miss the demise of Morphic. > > > > Thierry > > > >
