Or we can use the name from other languages like Liczydło in Polish :)
> On 05 Mar 2016, at 16:34, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was thinking as this name : Abacus
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abacus
> A calculating tool !
>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Serge Stinckwich
>> <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Nicolas Cellier
>>> <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2016-03-04 19:51 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> I personally never liked the name “SciSmalltalk”. “SciPharo” is much
>>>>> better in my opinion
>>>>> PhaNum is also okay to me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SciSmalltalk is ugly.
>>>
>>> I don't like the name either. We will find a better sexy name !
>>
>> Just a random line of thought...
>> PhaNum --> NumPha --> numcha --> numchi
>> --> numqi "An energy around numbers"
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi
>>
>> cheers -ben
>>
>>>> Currently, there is no package named SciSmalltalk.
>>>> SciSmalltalk is just:
>>>> - an aggregate of packages (a metacello configuration)
>>>> - a repository (github + Smalltalkhub)
>>>
>>> SciSmalltalk is a bit more than just a few packages ...
>>> We have tests, we have a CI job, we have a book.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Serge Stinckwich
>>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Serge Stinckwich
> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>
