2016-03-04 19:51 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>:
> I personally never liked the name “SciSmalltalk”. “SciPharo” is much > better in my opinion > PhaNum is also okay to me. > > SciSmalltalk is ugly. Currently, there is no package named SciSmalltalk. SciSmalltalk is just: - an aggregate of packages (a metacello configuration) - a repository (github + Smalltalkhub) If you name the Metacello configuration SciPharo, it's OK, because it does not really exclude any goodwill contributing from another Smalltalk flavour. If you name the repositories SciPharo, you start tainting a bit more... But well. > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > On Mar 2, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier < > nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV. > What is so much pharo specific in this library? > Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split? > > 2016-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com>: > >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: >> > This is great news! >> > >> > I would be interested in time series and distributions as well. >> >> Distributions are already there. I start some early work on time series. >> >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> >> > >
