On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2016-03-04 19:51 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>: >> >> I personally never liked the name “SciSmalltalk”. “SciPharo” is much >> better in my opinion >> PhaNum is also okay to me. >> > > SciSmalltalk is ugly.
I don't like the name either. We will find a better sexy name ! > Currently, there is no package named SciSmalltalk. > SciSmalltalk is just: > - an aggregate of packages (a metacello configuration) > - a repository (github + Smalltalkhub) SciSmalltalk is a bit more than just a few packages ... We have tests, we have a CI job, we have a book. -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
