On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Nicolas Cellier > <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 2016-03-04 19:51 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>: >>> >>> I personally never liked the name “SciSmalltalk”. “SciPharo” is much >>> better in my opinion >>> PhaNum is also okay to me. >>> >> >> SciSmalltalk is ugly. > > I don't like the name either. We will find a better sexy name !
Just a random line of thought... PhaNum --> NumPha --> numcha --> numchi --> numqi "An energy around numbers" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi cheers -ben >> Currently, there is no package named SciSmalltalk. >> SciSmalltalk is just: >> - an aggregate of packages (a metacello configuration) >> - a repository (github + Smalltalkhub) > > SciSmalltalk is a bit more than just a few packages ... > We have tests, we have a CI job, we have a book. > > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >
