On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2017-01-25 11:47 GMT+01:00 Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name>: > >> To be honest I think #isReadOnlyObject: is worse :) isXXX is a prefix for >> testing methods. isXXX with an argument feels even more strange. I would >> rather have #beReadOnly > > > Now there is #beReadOnlyObject and #beWritableObject. Maybe for primitive > it is better to use #primReadOnlyObject:. > > It also raise another question: does these primitives support mirror > approach? (when it can be called with receiver as first argument?) > Yes I made sure the mirror approach works. Even better, there are tests ensuring that it works. You can see in the class WriteBarrierTest that objects can become read-only through an instance of TTMirror, look for example into the users of TTMirror>>#setIsReadOnlyObjectOf: object to: boolean.
