I vote for a voting system for these kind of changes. I cannot say it more clearly, and I don't know why is asking for a voting system negative?
We all have problems. In the meantime you will make all the changes you like to do, and I will continue working on my own way, until I find there is more voice for the "small minority". 2017-04-15 9:30 GMT-03:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>: > Hi Hernan > > Why are you always so negative? Do you think that this is easy? > > Inria paid Denis to build a remote tool suite for ***research purpose*** > and we discovered that a new remote invocation framework was needed and > that they were far too many discussions between the model and the view. > Denis proposed to build a new browser (and it was not in our plans) and we > decided that we cannot do it otherwise. > We could keep this tool for us but we share it with the community. > > Do you want another example? > I asked christopher to build versionner and he discovered that he cannot > script well enough the model. And versionner was made > for everybody. Now with git we will have to revise it. > > Do you want another example? > Iceberg we payed nicolas passerini to analyse the situation and to build a > system that other people > can use it. > > Do you want another example? > Esteban got in his face the FFI problem: you see Spur arrives and FFI > nabive boost does not so what do we do? > He worked like a mad (and it was not planned because we thought that igor > would adpta NB to spur then to 64 bits). > And the FFI is for everbody. > > Do you want another example? > We spent one year with pavel, guillermo and christophe to make sure that > we can make sure that the three yars > effort of the phd of guillermo on bootstrap are not lost. > > Do you want more? > All my books are open-source? Do you know how much time I take to write a > book? > > I spent 8 months designing a mooc and do you know how much I earned doing > it: 3000 Euros ( so I will make the computation to know how much per hour I > lost) and the mooc is free. > > May be all these examples have no value for you. But for me they have. > > So you see you can piss on us if it makes you feeling better, and you can > rant in your corner. > But this is not the vision I have about a community because we are sharing > all the things that we are doing. > > Stef > > > > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Hernán Morales Durand < > hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> 2017-04-14 8:44 GMT-03:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >>> 2017-04-14 13:27 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Also I am really wondering that this decision was not publicly >>>> discussed. We should vote for such kind of changes. >>>> >>>> >>>> no, this is not how it works. >>>> >>> >>> yes, it is how it could work :) >>> >>> Current approach is not bad for technical choices because it is >>> difficult to make everybody evolved in particular technical topic. >>> But look&feel is different. You just open Pharo and have impression is >>> it looks good or not. Voting can work here. >>> >> >> I would forget about it. I stopped waiting for votes long time ago in >> this community. Also I decided to stop contributing to external projects >> (including reporting bugs) because who knows which tool (browser, morphic, >> etc) the board would like to add/remove tomorrow. I will not invest my time >> fixing tools who knows what's the plan on them. >> >> The best you can do is to work in the dark and adapt your stuff with each >> new Pharo version. >> Of course anyone with enough time/money could fork a new more democratic >> Pharo ;) >> >> Hernán >> >> >
