Bah, I made GTSpotter dark theme work with SublimishTheme and got the "yeah, for Pharo7".
It is pissing me off but what can I say, just follow what is released. Compare Pharo 1 and Pharo 6. Worlds apart. I hope this continues. Phil On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Hernán Morales Durand < hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote for a voting system for these kind of changes. I cannot say it more > clearly, and I don't know why is asking for a voting system negative? > > We all have problems. In the meantime you will make all the changes you > like to do, and I will continue working on my own way, until I find there > is more voice for the "small minority". > > 2017-04-15 9:30 GMT-03:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Hernan >> >> Why are you always so negative? Do you think that this is easy? >> >> Inria paid Denis to build a remote tool suite for ***research purpose*** >> and we discovered that a new remote invocation framework was needed and >> that they were far too many discussions between the model and the view. >> Denis proposed to build a new browser (and it was not in our plans) and >> we decided that we cannot do it otherwise. >> We could keep this tool for us but we share it with the community. >> >> Do you want another example? >> I asked christopher to build versionner and he discovered that he cannot >> script well enough the model. And versionner was made >> for everybody. Now with git we will have to revise it. >> >> Do you want another example? >> Iceberg we payed nicolas passerini to analyse the situation and to build >> a system that other people >> can use it. >> >> Do you want another example? >> Esteban got in his face the FFI problem: you see Spur arrives and FFI >> nabive boost does not so what do we do? >> He worked like a mad (and it was not planned because we thought that igor >> would adpta NB to spur then to 64 bits). >> And the FFI is for everbody. >> >> Do you want another example? >> We spent one year with pavel, guillermo and christophe to make sure that >> we can make sure that the three yars >> effort of the phd of guillermo on bootstrap are not lost. >> >> Do you want more? >> All my books are open-source? Do you know how much time I take to write a >> book? >> >> I spent 8 months designing a mooc and do you know how much I earned doing >> it: 3000 Euros ( so I will make the computation to know how much per hour I >> lost) and the mooc is free. >> >> May be all these examples have no value for you. But for me they have. >> >> So you see you can piss on us if it makes you feeling better, and you can >> rant in your corner. >> But this is not the vision I have about a community because we are >> sharing all the things that we are doing. >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Hernán Morales Durand < >> hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> 2017-04-14 8:44 GMT-03:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> >>>> 2017-04-14 13:27 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Also I am really wondering that this decision was not publicly >>>>> discussed. We should vote for such kind of changes. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> no, this is not how it works. >>>>> >>>> >>>> yes, it is how it could work :) >>>> >>>> Current approach is not bad for technical choices because it is >>>> difficult to make everybody evolved in particular technical topic. >>>> But look&feel is different. You just open Pharo and have impression is >>>> it looks good or not. Voting can work here. >>>> >>> >>> I would forget about it. I stopped waiting for votes long time ago in >>> this community. Also I decided to stop contributing to external projects >>> (including reporting bugs) because who knows which tool (browser, morphic, >>> etc) the board would like to add/remove tomorrow. I will not invest my time >>> fixing tools who knows what's the plan on them. >>> >>> The best you can do is to work in the dark and adapt your stuff with >>> each new Pharo version. >>> Of course anyone with enough time/money could fork a new more democratic >>> Pharo ;) >>> >>> Hernán >>> >>> >> >
