On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think it would be better to have ConfigurationOfRefactoring and two
> > other: ConfigurationOfOB and ConfigurationOfO2, which have the former
> > as a required project (and IIUC it was your first intention, right?).
> > This will reduce duplication of dependencies between projects.
>
> O2 breaks OB, if both are loaded. I suggest that the configurations
> should trigger a conflict when somebody tries to load both.
>
Lukas. Could you give me more details please? Look. This is the part of the
latest script we used to generate the dev image:
Gofer new
wiresong: 'ob';
addPackage: 'OmniBrowser';
addPackage: 'OB-Morphic';
addPackage: 'OB-Standard';
addPackage: 'OB-Refactory';
addPackage: 'OB-Regex';
addPackage: 'OB-SUnitIntegration';
addPackage: 'OB-Shout';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'EnhancedOB';
addPackage: 'OmniBrowser2';
addPackage: 'O2-Standard';
addPackage: 'O2-Morphic';
addPackage: 'O2-Enhancements';
addPackage: 'OCForO2';
addPackage: 'O2-Refactory';
load.
And there we are loading things from OB and O2. And the image don't seems to
be "broken".
Thanks.
Mariano
> Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
