I cannot find in the archives clues for that, so I'll ask here. Is there a reason we keep both O2 and OB in parallel? Can't we just get the best parts of one of the solutions and consider the other as the "trunk" or mainstream for Pharo?
-- Cesar Rabak Em 20/12/2009 06:32, Lukas Renggli < reng...@gmail.com > escreveu: > I think it would be better to have ConfigurationOfRefactoring and two > other: ConfigurationOfOB and ConfigurationOfO2, which have the former > as a required project (and IIUC it was your first intention, right?). > This will reduce duplication of dependencies between projects. O2 breaks OB, if both are loaded. I suggest that the configurations should trigger a conflict when somebody tries to load both. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
