On Dec 21, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:32 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is there a reason we keep both O2 and OB in parallel? Can't we
>> just get the best parts of one of the solutions and consider the
>> other as the "trunk" or mainstream for Pharo?
>
> Pharo must have the notion of Packages.
I'm working on it
have a look at RPackage in PharoTaskForces
I took into account the feedback I got from lukas and now the tests are
green again
so I should be able to continue and start to work on the integration
inside the system
but if someone wants to help or read the code....
> This is a prerequisite of a
> good package browser. Unless we have that, O2 will be slow and won't
> be the default.
>
> --
> Damien Cassou
> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
>
> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
> popular by not having them." James Iry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
