On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:32 PM,  <csra...@bol.com.br> wrote:
> Is there a reason we keep both O2 and OB in parallel?  Can't we
> just get the best parts of one of the solutions and consider the
> other as the "trunk" or mainstream for Pharo?

Pharo must have the notion of Packages. This is a prerequisite of a
good package browser. Unless we have that, O2 will be slow and won't
be the default.

-- 
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
popular by not having them." James Iry

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to