I suggest that we just remove the two methods (Collection>>#sorted and
Colection>>#sorted:) from Grease. It doesn't look like the system
itself is calling them on Collection, and most subclasses override
them anyway.

Lukas

On 9 September 2010 11:10, Philippe Marschall <kus...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi
>
> It seems like we unintentionally introduced an override for Collection
>>> #sorted in Grease. That puts in a hard place because we can't simply
> remove it from Grease. Because if you do that everybody who updates
> looses the method and potentially breaks his image. Yeah, I see that the
> real fix you be for Monticello to restore the old method but that hasn't
> happened in years.
>
> Monticello / the compiler already warns about a lot of less important
> things. Now I know adding an additional preference for that is ugly and
> I'd welcome and better/nicer solution.
>
> Cheers
> Philippe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>



-- 
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to