Why are you so aggressive against us? Now if you want status quo why do you even commit in squeak? Now I'm not sure that this is the kind of
>>> Isn't Grease dialect dependent by essence ? >>> If Pharo and Squeak diverge, then there will naturally be two versions >>> of Grease... >>> However, for these two messages, I think Pharo core should integrate >>> them and align with Squeak. The question is more whether you need to >>> distinguish Grease-Pharo1_1 from Grease-Pharo1_2 ... >> >> Probably else this means that Pharo and any system is bound to die because >> it does not change. > > The rapid changes and no-backwards-compatibility you prefer and advocate are > not essential for a Smalltalk system to "stay alive". Just look at VSE, it > didn't change in the last 10 years, and people are still using it. > In constrast Pharo 1.0 was considered abandonware four months after it's > release, which caused trouble for some users who didn't think that they'll > have to patch their code and rebuild their images to "get" updates/fixes. Pharo1.0 is not abandoned at all. Since 1.0 we got more than 1000 bugs closed. The versions are just a way to have milestones. Now there is no problem you think otherwise Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
