+1 to SMark On 14 March 2011 15:06, Henrik Sperre Johansen <henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no> wrote: > On 14.03.2011 10:19, Stefan Marr wrote: >> >> Hi Toon: >> >> On 14 Mar 2011, at 09:52, Toon Verwaest wrote: >>>> >>>> Since the general idea is to write benchmarks like unit tests, how about >>>> 'SMark'/'SBench' instead of 'SUnit'? >>> >>> And he immediately calls it after himself! S<tefan>mar<r>k ;) >> >> Rather farfetched no? :-P >> >> The SMark was inspired by names like 3DMark, FutureMark, CoreMark, >> SYSmark, WebMark, MobileMark. > > I was actually about to suggest we call it SMarrk earlier today, but that > would probably be too obvious :D > > Anyways, in regards to using PharoBenchmarks/PBenchmark/etc, +100 to > Stefan's reply. > It is important to keep the framework in a separate repository. (whose name > does not imply it is specific to any dialect) > Mariano: Don't mix/confuse the framework with the uses of it. > > Cheers, > Henry > > >
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
