and what do you do to change the situation?

Stef

On Jun 2, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:

> After following the discussion for some time, I have the impression that 
> there are some smalltalkers suffering similar usability problems like my 
> friend and me and some more or less enjoy the actual state.
> Dolphin 6 Professional introduced IdeaSpace. With that you can have both - 
> single windows and tabbed windows.
> It's up to the user to either open windows outside IdeaSpace as independent 
> windows or inside IdeaSpace as tabbed windows.
> Having the free choice is a good thing. Especially if you don't want to 
> alienate newcomers that are used to use tabbed windows. I like this approach.
> 
> I haven't looked at TWM yet due to lack of time. I am hardly able to read the 
> mail traffic in the evenings.
> But I asked my friend to have a look at it. He promised to do so although 
> it's not suited to Pharo 1.2.1.
> As Pharo 1.3 is not yet stable I fear that he might have new problems in 
> other areas.
> 
> What strikes me during this discussion is that nobody seem to have the same 
> problem with window sizes and positions.
> I don't like RealEstateAgent and I don't think that a revamped one will solve 
> the problems. At least as long it doesn't provide the possibility
> to set sizes on the fly. No algorithm can guess the requirements of all users.
> I also haven't heard about applications written in Squeak or Pharo and what 
> about user thereof think about the usability. IMO there is a lack of
> an appropriate framework for dealing with such things. Or is everybody 
> developing web applications nowadays?
> 
> I have a hard time to promote Smalltalk because of its actual state. I always 
> tell people about my favorite programming
> language, but I also tell them that alas there is no good implementation of 
> it available. This is sad but true, even if Pharo and Squeak made
> big progress during the last months. Both, Squeak and Pharo, aren't products 
> but just tools. And that makes a big difference.
> The commercial products have characteristics that make them not very 
> attractive to people not yet involved. Despite Dolphin they all have
> dated user interfaces, too. When I try to convince people to have a look at 
> Dolphin they typically tell me: very nice but it seems to be dead already.
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas


Reply via email to