Tx!
On Dec 8, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Martin Dias wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@beta9.be> wrote: > > On 08 Dec 2011, at 18:43, Martin Dias wrote: > > > I think the problem is that this method supposes n >= 1: > > Yeah, that is why I propose a guard, maybe in this method > > n = 0 ifTrue: [ ^ buffer] > > thanks, it fixes the issue (inserted at the beginning of > InflateStream>>next:into:startingAt:). > > The same issue should happen sending > InflateStream>>readInto:startingAt:count: > > I guess we should add some tests in CompressionTests package. I can do it on > a couple of days. > > > > but I have no time to analyze the consequences/implications. > > Sven > > > >
