To be honest, if it works, I do not want to lose my time on Configuration
It shouldn't be done by hand, but generated by a tool :) Ben On Feb 20, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Benjamin > <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello guys, > > I know a some of you are waiting for the integration of the RB engine into > Nautilus. > > Some of them are already implemented, so if you wanna test them, here is the > gofer script > > Gofer new > url: 'http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Nautilus'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfNautilus'; > load. > > (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring) perform: #loadDefault > > > > > So...that's the way of loading Nautilus with refactorings? Wouldn't it be > better to include RB dependencis in ConfigurationOfNautilus and have a > specific group there. So you can do for example > > ConfigurationOfNautilus project stableVersion load: 'WithRefactorings'. > > ? > > BTW, I checked the ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring and it looks you miss a > critical feature of Metacello: project references :) From > ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring you can directly depend on > ConfigurationOfRB or ConfigurationOfNautilus rather than duplicating > everything in there. Don't tell Stef you didn't read the chapter hahahaha > > > > It loads everything. > > For now I have only done some refactorings for classes, so if you popup the > menu on a class, a new item named Refactoring should appear :) > > Moreover, the 'rename class' method is replaced by the RB one :) > > > Thanks in advance for your feedback, and if you want to participate, you are > more than welcome :) > > > Ben > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >
