Hi, It does not really matters where you put the test. What matters is to have the tools that show them properly, and we are going in that direction. We already have ways to "jump to tests" in Nautilus, and we will continue improving that to show them together (for example). But I do not think the tests need to be *in* the class definition to have same level of interoperation.
Esteban On Nov 17, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Andy Burnett <andy.burn...@knowinnovation.com> wrote: > I have just come across the Pyret language. It looks interesting, but the > part which particularly caught my interest was the way that they had built > the unit tests directly into the classes, rather than having separate test > classes. > > I think this is an interesting idea. It seems as though it would be easier to > manage writing tests if everything were in one location. And this - might - > mean that people were more likely to write tests. > > Has anyone else looked at this, and have an opinion on whether it would be a > good addition to Pharo 4/5/X? > > Cheers > Andy
