stepharo wrote >> About Dolphin, well, as you point, the ability to generate an exe and >> some >> other features more of the side of publishing a commercial app, make hard >> to >> abandon it (also the UI builder). > > Yes we would love to have the same facilities. > This is why we worked on Fuel because we would like to have a better > deployement (but this is orthogonal to deliver dll). > We would love people to work on that.
Even when Dolphin can generate dll's, to my point of view is more important the capacity of generate a standalone executable (for Windows operating systems) and the ability of behave as a native application (multiple windows for example). -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Porting-to-a-MAC-tp4788105p4788374.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
