Werner, > On 30 Nov 2015, at 15:15, Werner Kassens <wkass...@libello.com> wrote: > > Hi, > SortedCollection>>storeOn: seems to have a little problem since it does not > store sortBlock and the used super-method (in Collection) uses #add: which > uses sortBlock and their default uses #<=, hence if the elements are not > comparable via #<=, but need a special sortblock, one gets an error on > retrieving that collection. of course i can circumvent that tiny problem by > defining #<= or using fuel, but i wonder whether i should report that on the > bugtracker? btw perhaps some other collections with instanceVariables which > do not define their own #storeOn: (eg Heap) could also have eventually some > problems. > werner
I am not so sure the #storeOn: / #readFrom: mechanism is still being maintained. I am not using it in any case, I thought it was mostly broken. I would be surprised if someone is still using it for real. But I might be wrong. In that case there should be a suite of real unit tests that defines and maintains the expected behaviour. And then you would be right, we should fix it. Sven
