Hi again, > On Dec 9, 2015, at 3:30 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the question. I am at a conference, and I just took this problem > to explain someone what code querying can mean :). > > Here is the result: > http://ws.stfx.eu/CCSNJVWX3JKS > I just realized that isPharoClass only exists in my image for the moment :)
Doru > <storeOn.png> > > I think this is how we should document our communication because now we have > the tools. > > Cheers, > Doru > > >> On Dec 3, 2015, at 7:00 AM, Werner Kassens <wkass...@libello.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Stephane, >> there are 89 senders of #storeOn: minus around 30 implementations of >> #storeOn: minus around 10 tests, also things like the PharoChangesCondenser >> use it. then there are 26 senders of #storeString (essentially the same >> functionality implemented via #storeOn:, but returns a string) eg used by >> the StartupPreferencesLoader. and there are several senders of #store: that >> are not implementations of #storeOn:. iow deprecating #storeOn: looks a bit >> complicated to me and is obviously way above my head. >> werner >> >> On 11/30/2015 09:42 PM, stepharo wrote: >>> It would be good to check who is using that and evaluate if we can >>> remove it. >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing should have the right to be different." > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "One cannot do more than one can do."
