Another suggestion: if you intend to make something cross dialect and hope to get traction, I would not use a project name which contains one dialect, but something more general like Cryptography, or some cool project name, like Seaside, Fuel, ...
> On 04 Dec 2015, at 15:43, Robert Withers <robert.w.with...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I use squeak 5.0 and would want the Fuel support to customize for wire > serializations and substitutions, such that Squeak and Pharo could talk to > each other, and all other Fuel environments. The Fuel changes I made are in > the Pharo port of SqueakElib in the SqueakElib-CapTP-Serialization category > and consist of a Decoder, Materializer and a Materialization. > > Robert > > On 12/04/2015 09:35 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> which squeak version? >> of what? >> >>> On 04 Dec 2015, at 12:15, Robert Withers <robert.w.with...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I just realized that the squeak version uses ReferenceStream while the >>> Pharo version uses Fuel, so the binary serializations are different and >>> they won't speak to each other. Any chance that Fuel is ported to Squeak? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Robert >>> >>> On 12/04/2015 06:11 AM, Robert Withers wrote: >>>> I am unable to import these files into SqueakSource, so it may be best >>>> done from inside Pharo with Monticello. Here are working Crypto and >>>> SqueakElib in Pharo, prior to SecureSession refactoring and Reed Solomon. >>>> I include the correct version of LayeredProtocol. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Robert >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/04/2015 05:47 AM, Robert Withers wrote: >>>>> Best Regards >>>>> >>>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography.html >>>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/squeakelib.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12/04/2015 05:44 AM, Robert Withers wrote: >>>>>> After my password reset on squeaksource, I committed to both >>>>>> Cryptography and SqueakElib, project links below. >>>>>> >>>>>> In the case of Cryptography, I had a version ported to Pharo ... I will >>>>>> organize Pharo ports of both after Reed Solomon is stable, and announce >>>>>> them to the Pharo list. This way both environments can be supported >>>>>> through this one repository. >>>>>> >>>>>> Robert >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/04/2015 04:35 AM, Stephan Eggermont wrote: >>>>>>> On 03-12-15 23:06, Robert Withers wrote: >>>>>>>> Are any of these used by both squeak and Pharo? That would be the >>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>> move I think. I will ask about getting my password reset for >>>>>>>> squeaksource, since that is where the old code resides. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All of them. Mostly timing of project start/high activity and who are >>>>>>> maintaining it decided on platforms. There was a time when squeaksource >>>>>>> was not so stable and then many projects migrated, and I currently hear >>>>>>> least about stability issues from ss3, but the load on smalltalkhub is >>>>>>> much higher, I assume, as that is used for the pharo ci. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the not so far future Pharo is likely to move to a git based >>>>>>> infrastructure, using libgit2. Early adopters are already using it. >>>>>>> I haven't heard the squeak ideas about that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stephan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
