> On 11 Aug 2017, at 21:10, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi, > >> On 11 Aug 2017, at 18:57, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com >> <mailto:cyril.ferli...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Another step would be to get a minimal parser not relying on >> PetitParser. > > Let’s think differently: why not to include a tiny PetitParser? > Then we can think on: > > - pillar sintax (better than just a restricted version) *syntax*… sorry for spanish intromission ;)
btw… not just outside the image (as readme). There was a prototype about rich text (using pillar, of course) for class comments. Esteban > - simplify other “small parsers” that are already on the image. > - we provide a tool to o cool stuff (instead relying as always in regexp, > etc.) > > cheers, > Esteban
