Of course, I/we recognise and appreciate all the work that's gone into docs in pillar - but I think it should be reasonably straightforward to write a converter as it is pretty closely related from what I have seen.
So I don't make the suggestion flippantly, and would want to help write a converter and get us to a common ground where we can differentiate on the aspects where we can excel. Tim Sent from my iPhone > On 11 Aug 2017, at 23:21, Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A long time issue with Markdown was that there was no standardization (and > when I used Pillar's MD export ~2 years ago it didn't work well). > > However CommonMark ( http://spec.commonmark.org/0.28/ ) has become the > de-facto standard, so it would make sense to support it bidirectionally with > Pillar. > >> The readme.md that Peter is talking about is gfm markdown > > Well, technically it is just a CommonMark, as I am not using any github > extensions. > (Github uses CommonMarks and adds just couple small extensions.) > > Peter >
