Jimmie, Since you started this thread, I have to ask.
You say you are an advocate of open source software. OK. But are you just on the consumer side or also on the producer side ? In other words, have you written/published/supported any non-trivial open source software ? Are you an academic or are you involved in commercial software (i.e. have you written closed software that you sell or otherwise make money off) ? Sven > On 2 Oct 2017, at 22:06, Jimmie Houchin <jlhouc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No I have not. I don't tend to go their direction very often. I am an > advocate of open source software but am not a fan of FSF's ethics or > political opinions. And as you say, that want all software to be GPL. Also, I > do prefer to hear third party opinions especially those who have potentially > court tested ones. That is ultimately where we find the true definition and > understanding. > > Thanks. > > Jimmie > > > > On 10/02/2017 02:48 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote: >> >> But of course this is written by FSF, and for them GPL is not just a legal >> matter, but an ethical one (and from their perspective GPL being a virus >> infecting other code is a good comparison, because they really want to take >> over). > >