I liked it. Actually I thought it was Richard's most balanced piece to date - except the poke in the cl paragraph. Something softer like "Pharo might not be right for you, but its worth taking a look at" would be better.
And for spreading the word, perhaps controversy is better than being ignored - hard to know though. Duty calls... https://xkcd.com/386/ btw, in the linked study interesting to see that Excel has even better function point efficiency than Smalltalk - which reminds me, Excel provides a workable "Image" analogy. The data shares the same file as the code. cheers -ben On 16 November 2017 at 17:07, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.kriva...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please, please, please, stop to write such kind of articles. You are doing > a really bad service to us. You can help to Pharo in many other ways. You > will not convince people to use Pharo by spitting on everything else. > One fixed typo has incomparably bigger value than blogpost like this. > > -- Pavel > > 2017-11-16 5:13 GMT+01:00 horrido <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com>: > >> Why Pharo Might be the Future of Software Development >> <https://blog.appacademy.io/pharo-future-software-development/> >> >> Spread the word. >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >> >> >
